Gaybombay’s Weblog

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gay_bombay/

Anti-gay law was an instrument of exploitation: Moily

leave a comment »

Anti-gay law was an instrument of exploitation: Moily

PTI | New Delhi

Apprehending misuse of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against homosexuals in the future, Law Minister Veerappa Moily has said the law should not become an instrument of exploitation by authorities.

Moily while admitting that the anti-gay law had been misused in the past, complimented the Delhi High Court for a "well-research, well-documented, well-argued" judgement decriminalising homosexuality.

"If it has been misused earlier, it can be misused in future as well. Any law should not be used as an instrument of exploitation, harassment or allow the authority to misuse it.

"This is one such provision that has a tendency of misuse and exploitation, and has been misused," Moily told Karan Thapar in CNN-IBN’s Devil’s Advocate programme.

"One thing must go to the credit of the Delhi High Court judgement — It is well-documented, well-researched, well-argued. I must tell the judges…The subject may be difficult, but at the same time this is one judgement, which has really stood out in the judicial annals of this country," he said.

Pointing out that several laws enacted in the pre-Independence British Raj contradicted the Constitution and may not stand scrutiny, he said, adding that such laws include some sections of the IPC and the Evidence Act.

"We have a Constitution — many a times the Constitution runs parallel to many laws which were enacted earlier to the Constitution coming into force. This includes many provisions including some of the sections under the IPC or the Evidence Act," Moily said.

"Many of these things (laws), if put to acid test of the Constitution, they may not stand up to the scrutiny. This is the apprehension," he added.

The Law Minister said either the Constitution makers did not anticipate this situation or a review of the laws or the Constitution should have taken place for properly synchronising the two.

On reasons for the Government not asking for a stay of the Delhi HC judgement before the Supreme Court, Moily said it would have been "preposterous", as it was an important question of law relation to Constitutional rights of liberty and privacy.

"They (HC) have given a judgement. As against that, obtaining a stay may be sometimes preposterous, unless we have a final verdict from the Supreme Court," he said.

There would occasions when the Government would not seek to reverse a judgement, he said, adding that the Supreme Court or the Judiciary have rights to lay down the law.

Email: moderator@gaybombay.in

Web Sites:

www.gaybombay.in

www.gaybombay.info

www.gayindia.org

E Groups:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gay_bombay

http://groups.google.com/group/Gaybombay

GB Internet Radio

http://www.gaybombay.in/gbradio

Gaybombay breaking news and annoucements

http://labs.google.co.in/smschannels/subscribe/Gaybombay

Emergency Helpline number 9820565885

Orkut:

http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Community.aspx?cmm=22091955

Blogs:

http://gaybombay.blogspot.com

https://gaybombay.wordpress.com

Twitter

http://twitter.com/gaybombay

Facebook

facebook.com/gaybombay

Advertisements

Written by gaybombay

August 2, 2009 at 11:41 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: